Did Israel Folau Quote the Bible?

For some, all Israel Folau did was to quote a 2000-year-old text. Others are not so sure.

The Instagram post that led to his sacking by Rugby Australia is a meme accompanied by a ‘caption’ (using Insta’s language).

Claiming that Folau quoted the Bible in his caption should be uncontroversial. There are three passages there, faithfully cut-and-pasted from a recognised translation.

But it was the meme, not the caption, that caused offence. The problem, evidently, was the word ‘homosexuals,’ and it doesn’t appear in the caption.

So, the question then is: did Israel Folau quote the Bible in the meme?

Not as such. Izzy didn’t create the meme. It predates his post. For example, @travon_love posted it on IG in June 2017, and that was a repost of a now-closed account.

A google search of ‘visually similar’ images reveals that there is another version with slightly different text. In fact, warnings of hell presented as road/danger signs appear to be a sub-genre of Christian memes – that is, they’re a thing.

So, the question then is: did Israel Folau post a meme that quotes the Bible?

No, he didn’t. At least not in the sense that a quote would contain the exact words and phrases used in the original. The closest Bible passage is 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, but it is not quoted. Check it out for yourself! Here it is in the closest translation:

9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. (1 Cor 6:9-10 NKJV)

So, the question then is: did Israel Folau post a meme that is a reasonable paraphrase of the Bible?

Now we’re dabbling in shades of grey – a grey that I am sorry to say turns out to be rather pale.

The meme is true to the Bible only in the sense that most of what it says can be deduced from the passage if we combine it with a little prior knowledge.

1 Corinthians 6:9 says that ‘wrongdoers’ will not inherit the ‘Kingdom of Heaven.’ If we know the Bible, we know that in this context, among other things, the Kingdom of Heaven refers to eternal life in a New Creation. The meme makes the correct inference that the destination of those who do not inherit this kingdom is hell (see Mark 9:45-48).

But – and this is a significant but – the meme does not reflect the verse’s most natural sense.

There are a few problems:

Firstly, the meme is targeted at non-Christians, calling them to repent. In these verses, Paul is writing to Christians, reminding them of what they once were (1 Cor 9:11).

Secondly, Paul is not threatening the Corinthians with hell; he is reminding them of who they already are (people who will inherit the Kingdom) and imploring them to act accordingly.

Thirdly, the meme introduces the idea of salvation, which is not in the text, and does so in a way that is not true to the letter.

The Corinthian church was not ‘being saved’ (1 Cor 1:18) principally because they stopped committing these sins (although that’s important), but because they called ‘on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ’ and held to the message of his death and resurrection (1 Cor 1:2; 15:2). Those who are ‘perishing’ are those for whom this message is ‘foolishness’ (1 Cor 1:18). The meme focuses on behaviour; Paul focuses on the gospel.

Fourthly, the meme has manipulated the list of sins. Coveting (or greed) – a sin that is sometimes swept under plush carpet in western Christianity – has been left out and replaced with ‘atheists’ – a virtually unknown phenomenon in Paul’s day.

‘Revilers’ (or slanderers) escaped the meme’s attention. ‘Extortioners’ appear to have morphed into ‘liars’ (I guess they use lies to extort?). And the order has changed, making ‘drunks’ and ‘homosexuals’ more prominent, while idolatry and heterosexual sexual sins have been shuffled down the list.

Lastly, the word ‘homosexuals’ is problematic. Today, most people think of homosexuality as an innate orientation. However, the two Greek words that the meme combines as ‘homosexuals,’ focus more on the act than the orientation.

I think Rugby Australia would have found the meme offensive regardless of this subtlety. But people who experience same-sex attraction should know that, according to the Bible, they are not condemned for that attraction any more than a heterosexual person is condemned for experiencing wrong sexual desires. Both need their sexuality redeemed and all their sins forgiven. Both desperately need Christ and are called to live according to his kingdom.

So, did Israel Folau quote the Bible? No, he posted a meme that is a very loose paraphrase and supported it with a Bible verses in his caption.

However, what he posted is broadly consistent with the church’s historic understanding of the Bible; God is angry with human sin – including those listed – and will punish it at final judgment unless we are ‘saved’ from this destiny through Jesus. This happens – as one of Izzy’s texts indicates – when we receive forgiveness for our sins.

1 thought on “Did Israel Folau Quote the Bible?

  1. Pingback: The Con Job: An addendum reviewing the reviews of the review of the review of Jesus v Evangelicals – St. Eutychus

We would love to hear your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s